What’s the issue we’re aiming to address?
In late 2016, Samsung SDI was hit by highly publicised battery explosions in the Samsung Galaxy phone. It was this, alongside concerns over corporate governance, which led one of our responsible investment analysts to spend a week in February 2017 touring China and South Korea to look at the battery supply chain. This trip highlighted the problems that were surfacing around the involvement of child labour in cobalt mining. Cobalt is a key resource for batteries, and the complexities of the supply chain mean it is hard to verify the source of production.
The facts around child labour in cobalt are stark and link directly to the poor economic and security situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). When our analyst highlighted these points to the investment team, it was agreed that this was a material risk for Samsung SDI, and that it needed to be raised with management.
What has our engagement looked like?
We began by emailing the company to raise our concerns, and we followed up with calls in May 2017. The investor relations team members were somewhat surprised by our interest, but they worked hard to provide us with information. They arranged for us to talk to the in-house expert on the cobalt supply chain. These conversations indicated that Samsung SDI had been fairly active in assessing cobalt and had actually produced a report on the topic. However, management had felt it better not to publish the report, albeit that it was working on the points raised. The points covered a series of initiatives which were at an early stage in the DRC and would need monitoring for success. They also stressed the practicalities of working in the DRC and the complexities of the supply chain.
These conversations greatly improved our understanding of Samsung SDI’s actions on cobalt mining, and highlighted stages where we could be of assistance. The company had no meaningful disclosure in this area, and the general market perception was that it was not concerned about the issue. This was clearly not a fair representation, and so we contacted the CEO, via investor relations, to urge the company to publish its report on cobalt. We were pleased that this happened immediately. We also took the opportunity to urge the company to take on board the recommendations and to stress how important we felt this issue was to the company, something which clearly raised its profile internally.
At this point (June 2017), it was clear that this topic affected more companies than just Samsung SDI. No user of batteries could realistically claim not to be linked to cobalt from the DRC given the opaque supply chain, and given that battery usage covers a wide variety of companies. Samsung SDI had explained that it was working via the Responsible Cobalt Initiative (RCI) as the best way to drive real change.
For the rest of 2017, therefore, our focus was on talking to other companies and supporting the RCI. We talked to Apple in June, as a major end user of batteries. It was following many of the same routes as Samsung SDI, but we were interested in its work auditing the supply chain and efforts to persuade the Chinese smelting industry to take the issue seriously. It is also an active member of the RCI.
In October, we talked to the Chinese Chamber of Commerce for Metals, Minerals and Chemicals, explaining our concerns. We discussed the actions it is taking and its work with the RCI. All of this helped us build our own knowledge, but also maintain pressure across the supply chain. In November, we attended the Geneva meeting of the RCI, which brought together miners, car and battery manufacturers, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Chinese government. As one of the few asset managers at the meeting, we were able publicly to support its work while urging greater action from all the participants at the meeting.
In 2018, we continued to focus on Samsung SDI and became part of the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI)-supported Engagement on Responsible Sourcing of Cobalt steering committee with a global coalition of PRI investors who are active in the area. In particular, we followed up on the initiatives that were discussed in 2017 to monitor progress. We pushed specifically on the issue of a supply- chain audit and the need for surprise audit visits to give credibility to the programme. Samsung SDI has been very active in the RCI, and suggested that the auto manufacturers are the missing link in this work.
In 2019, alongside PRI signatories, we co-led cobalt-specific engagements with Samsung SDI, Samsung Electronics and Volkswagen, and supporting discussions with Apple. We held discussions to establish the companies’ understanding of the situation, what actions they were taking to identify risks in the supply chain, and how they planned to implement the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas. The guidance aims for greater transparency and auditing in the supply chain.
As part of our wider work addressing child labour in the cobalt supply chain, we also attended the 2019 OECD Forum on Responsible Mineral Supply Chains, to learn more about developing human rights regulations, supply-chain due diligence, and civil society’s concerns. In plenaries, we urged corporate attendees to adopt the new OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals, and asked all actors along the cobalt supply chain, including the DRC government, to work together on the ground to improve working conditions.
In late 2019 we hosted an investor round table on responsible cobalt sourcing, with attendees including asset managers, NGOs, the PRI, and companies. This forum was used to candidly discuss the progress that has been made, and challenges that both investors and companies were encountering in improving the sourcing of cobalt, as well as insights on the ground from local NGOs.
We have continued these engagements throughout 2020, although the Covid-19 pandemic has inevitably affected our work. However, we have used this time to remain active within the PRI steering group, and have held calls with the Responsible Minerals Initiative and OECD to better understand the impacts of the pandemic, as well as what may be reasonably expected of companies during this time. In particular, we have discussed the impact that the pandemic has had on supply-chain auditing and the role of collaboration across the industry.
We have also raised concerns after some companies publicly announced that they had decided to formally remove cobalt from artisanal and small-scale mines (ASMs) from their supply chains. We have emphasised that we do not think removing ASM suppliers is effective, nor should it be supported, given the consequences that this can have (removing informal suppliers does not improve working conditions, and potentially takes away a source of income from workers who already tend to be in precarious positions). Instead, we expect to see companies engaging with suppliers to increase formalisation and improve working conditions on the ground. We will continue to engage in this area and hope to increase the intensity of this work again as global economies begin to emerge from the pandemic.
Has anything changed?
Overall, we believe that Samsung SDI has taken a number of steps that will improve lives in the DRC, and were particularly impressed when the company announced a joint initiative with BMW Group, BASF SE and Samsung Electronics to launch a cobalt pilot project in the DRC, with the aim to improve artisanal mining working conditions, as well as living conditions for surrounding communities.
We will continue to engage with our invested companies on this topic, and work with other investors to improve transparency along the cobalt supply chain. We also need to monitor the results of the continuing programmes in the DRC to measure success in reducing child labour, and to stay engaged with RCI and ensure it remains aware that this is an issue which investors care about. The approach we took regarding Samsung SDI and cobalt mining shows the purpose and engagement with which we aim to address all ESG issues.
Your capital may be at risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the original amount invested.
This is a financial promotion. These opinions should not be construed as investment or other advice and are subject to change. This material is for information purposes only. This material is for professional investors only. Any reference to a specific security, country or sector should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell investments in those securities, countries or sectors. Please note that holdings and positioning are subject to change without notice.
Issued by Newton Investment Management Limited, The Bank of New York Mellon Centre, 160 Queen Victoria Street, London, EC4V 4LA. Registered in England No. 01371973. Newton Investment Management is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, 12 Endeavour Square, London, E20 1JN and is a subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Newton Investment Management Limited is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Newton’s investment business is described in Form ADV, Part 1 and 2, which can be obtained from the SEC.gov website or obtained upon request. ‘Newton’ and/or ‘Newton Investment Management’ brand refers to Newton Investment Management Limited.
This material is for Australian wholesale clients only and is not intended for distribution to, nor should it be relied upon by, retail clients. This information has not been prepared to take into account the investment objectives, financial objectives or particular needs of any particular person. Before making an investment decision you should carefully consider, with or without the assistance of a financial adviser, whether such an investment strategy is appropriate in light of your particular investment needs, objectives and financial circumstances.
Newton Investment Management Limited is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence in respect of the financial services it provides to wholesale clients in Australia and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority of the UK under UK laws, which differ from Australian laws.
Newton Investment Management Limited (Newton) is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), 12 Endeavour Square, London, E20 1JN. Newton is providing financial services to wholesale clients in Australia in reliance on ASIC Corporations (Repeal and Transitional) Instrument 2016/396, a copy of which is on the website of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, www.asic.gov.au. The instrument exempts entities that are authorised and regulated in the UK by the FCA, such as Newton, from the need to hold an Australian financial services license under the Corporations Act 2001 for certain financial services provided to Australian wholesale clients on certain conditions. Financial services provided by Newton are regulated by the FCA under the laws and regulatory requirements of the United Kingdom, which are different to the laws applying in Australia.