Re-thinking fund accounting This is as true of fund accounting as it is elsewhere. Traditional systems have been built by and for accountants, not by and for operational business people. So naturally if you were to ask a group of fund accountants to specify a system, the result would be remarkably similar to what is now in place at most institutions. But if you take a step back and blend the accounting requirements with the operational business problem, you would come up with a very different solution. Industry experts are beginning to agree that there is a need to unify the underlying fund accounting and transaction processing application with data management, reconciliation and business process management or process control in one system. Rather than having these functions separated out across several platforms, integration eliminates replication and drives efficiency. If it were just a matter of technological change, we might have to wait a few more years before the way systems are currently used and our expectations of them are challenged. This time, however, the natural technology lifecycle has coincided with new financial realities. For example, the funds industry has seen pension schemes rapidly increase their asset pools. The 13 largest pension markets hit a record high of US$26.5 trillion in 2010, dwarfing the US$3.5 trillion in sovereign wealth funds, according to Towers Watson. These larger and increasingly skilled institutions are asking more questions about how much the industry is charging to manage their money. Funds managers therefore have both the financial driver for re-assessing their accounting processes, and the technological means of achieving it. There are real opportunities for firms to consider how technology can drive endto- end operational excellence and address business problems rather than focus purely on improvements to general ledger, trial balance and reporting functionality.







Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.