QIC alternative investments seeks 4.5 per cent plus annual returns (corrected)

A correction to this article was issued on October 27.

QIC alternative investments, which is seeking to build a portfolio that behaves differently from stocks and bonds, is seeking an annual net return of 4.5 per cent plus the consumer price index over five years.*QIC’s Beta Fund has delivered a net return of 5.1 per cent between its inception in December last year and September this year, says James Dick, head of alternative investments at QIC. It is managing about $150 million and has commitments of $220 million.

Dick says the fund has invested in listed infrastructure and commodities. It has invested in managers who invest for  Stanford and Duke Universities endowment funds.* It has bought insurance-linked assets including catastrophe bonds and alternative fixed interest products.

The fund is examining whether to invest in other securities.

A minimum investment in QIC’s Beta Fund is $10 million, says Dick.* QIC manages $57.8 billion, with more than half of the fund Queensland State Government money.

* The article has been corrected to state that QIC’s fund is seeking a CPI plus 4.5 per cent annual return; to state that the fund invests in endowment managers who invest for Stanford and Duke Universities endowment funds; and that the minimum investment in the fund is $10 million.

, , , , , , , , , , ,

6 responses to “QIC alternative investments seeks 4.5 per cent plus annual returns (corrected)”

  1. And the point is?

    I doubt they will either

  2. Widely Read

    You might get 4.5% from a TD, but doubt you’ll get 4.5% + Inflation.

  3. Widely Read

    You might get 4.5% from a TD, but doubt you’ll get 4.5% + Inflation.

  4. And the point is?

    I think I’ll just invest in a 5 yr TD, with no ‘intellectual risk’. Thanks all the same.

  5. And the point is?

    I think I’ll just invest in a 5 yr TD, with no ‘intellectual risk’. Thanks all the same.

Leave a Comment

Geopolitical risks rewire asset allocation ‘operating system’: GIC

Some investors are “missing the point” of geopolitical risks by equating them to the disruptions from conflicts and wars, according to GIC chief economist Prakash Kannan, but in reality, geopolitical risk is no longer episodic or peripheral. This means investors need to think harder about inflation and country composition in their portfolio.

Sort content by