Oversight lacking in fund outsourcing

Asset managers have outsourced a lot of functions but in many cases have not gleaned the efficiencies they had hoped, says Geoff Hodge, chief executive of financial software firm Milestone Group.

“Outsourcing takes more resources than initially thought,” says Hodge. “Some fund managers thought they had outsourced 100 people but have found they have got 20 to 30 back.”

About 85 per cent of North American fund managers outsource some part of the business, he says. But many have found there has been a lack of oversight or a level of detail on their business activities that do not satisfy internal and external demands.

Many asset managers have had to devote more resources than they had originally planned to achieve an appropriate level of oversight of their outsourced business. Those who have maintained their outsourcing objectives have found they have not been able to undertake the level of oversight now required.

“Given that challenge of trying to balance costs with an appropriate level of oversight, Milestone has been able to automate oversight to allow clients to achieve the level of detail and timeliness they’re looking for at a reasonable cost,” says Hodge.

Conexus Financial, the publisher of i&t News, is hosting a custody conference on Thursday, February 16 at Sydney’s Hilton Hotel on George Street. If you are interested in attending, click here.

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Geopolitical risks rewire asset allocation ‘operating system’: GIC

Some investors are “missing the point” of geopolitical risks by equating them to the disruptions from conflicts and wars, according to GIC chief economist Prakash Kannan, but in reality, geopolitical risk is no longer episodic or peripheral. This means investors need to think harder about inflation and country composition in their portfolio.

Sort content by