Returns, costs of private equity questioned

The audience was aghast. This was not what they had come to hear. David Brown, chairman of the Australian Private Equity and Venture Capital Association, was momentarily befuddled.

It was after all a conference for Australia’s most prominent private equity firms organised by the Asian Venture Capital Journal. To question the industry in such a setting seemed like heresy.

Yet a $19 billion superannuation fund and a prominent consultant were calling into question the transparency, returns and costs of investing in private equity.

Corrin Collocott, portfolio manager at Sunsuper, says private equity delivered just a 1 per cent return to the fund last year. That was simply not good enough, he says.

Graeme Miller, head of investment at Towers Watson in Australia, says many superannuation funds were not bothering to invest in private equity.

“Put yourself in the shoes of the funds,” says Miller to an audience of shocked private equity general partners and their salesmen. “They are running financial services businesses that have daily liquidity requirements, daily unit pricing and are highly cognitive of fees.”

“But it produces the best returns,” protested Brown, former head of private markets at Victorian Funds Management Corporation.

Private equity is an illiquid investment. Miller says is not suited to the superannuation business model.

“Trustees build investment portfolios within the system, knowing that at any time a member can ask for their balance,” he says. Moreover, “costs of investing in private equity are high”.

Moreover, Miller says, about 20 per cent of a superannuation fund’s fee budget is spent on analysing private equity funds that comprise on average 3 per cent of their investments.

Collocott says superannuation funds have been burned by the private equity investments made around the height of the buyout boom between 2003 and 2007.

“Such investments are clogging up portfolios and taking up management time,” he says.

Miller says private equity’s reluctance to change its fee structure and its internal organisation was hurting it.

“If private equity funds were structured more like real estate funds with regard to their fees, liquidity and transparency, they may find it easier to attract money,” he says.

Brown simply reiterated that private equity produced the best returns.

“I don’t think we should accept the statement that private equity produces the best returns,” says Collocott.

He says Sunsuper had to do its own extensive analysis and travel around the world to select the private equity it would ultimately invest in.

“We weren’t very successful sitting on our bums waiting for people to tell us they were the best,” says Collocott.

General partners, he reckons, have an attitude problem.

“They’re unfriendly when capital is plentiful,” he says. “They don’t make returns available. Their complex structures make it difficult to find their real returns. Why is it so difficult to prove that returns are better than all asset classes?”

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

16 responses to “Returns, costs of private equity questioned”

  1. Brett

    What wasn’t highlighted by the critics on PE in the article was how they had approached investing in the asset class. It is moslt likely that they have invested into a bunch of primary funds in 2005,2006 and 2007 which are still deep in the j-curve, depending on the quality of their manager selection. As Frankly says above PE has a role in the portfolio but the success of its use is born about how you approach the investing in the asset class over the economic cycle.

  2. Brett

    What wasn’t highlighted by the critics on PE in the article was how they had approached investing in the asset class. It is moslt likely that they have invested into a bunch of primary funds in 2005,2006 and 2007 which are still deep in the j-curve, depending on the quality of their manager selection. As Frankly says above PE has a role in the portfolio but the success of its use is born about how you approach the investing in the asset class over the economic cycle.

  3. Phil B

    The statement that illiquid investments are not suitable for superannuation funds is interesting. That and the comments around it imply that super funds are continually expecting all their members to withdraw everything tomorrow.

    Superannuation is a long term vision and unless a fund is doing a terrible job and scaring all its members, the government mandated continual inflows make it very easy to keep ahead of the proportionately small outflows. Given that balance, high performing illiquid investments have a very good place within a Super fund.

    I would suggest there are three other key reasons that are keeping the funds out of private equity:

    1) Private equity selections need highly specialised skills which the majority of super funds do not have in house and very few consultants want to take the risk associated with the selection. Nobody is ever fired for choosing a passive equity mandate, but if you choose an underperfoming private equity deal your shortcomings become very obvious. Very few Trustees are qualified to take on this risk.

    2) PE deals, more often than not, do not show their true returns for many years. This is contrary to the immediate need to report your performance as a fund on a short term basis. Investors are very focused on short term returns and the current peer comparison model does not encourage long term decision making.

    3) There is a current focus within the industry of reducing fees almost at any cost. Sometimes I am convinced that a fund with 0 fees and a negative return would win an industry award for excellence! This mentality makes it very difficult for a fund to invest in what everyone agrees is an investment with high entry and administrative costs, no matter what the return.

  4. Phil B

    The statement that illiquid investments are not suitable for superannuation funds is interesting. That and the comments around it imply that super funds are continually expecting all their members to withdraw everything tomorrow.

    Superannuation is a long term vision and unless a fund is doing a terrible job and scaring all its members, the government mandated continual inflows make it very easy to keep ahead of the proportionately small outflows. Given that balance, high performing illiquid investments have a very good place within a Super fund.

    I would suggest there are three other key reasons that are keeping the funds out of private equity:

    1) Private equity selections need highly specialised skills which the majority of super funds do not have in house and very few consultants want to take the risk associated with the selection. Nobody is ever fired for choosing a passive equity mandate, but if you choose an underperfoming private equity deal your shortcomings become very obvious. Very few Trustees are qualified to take on this risk.

    2) PE deals, more often than not, do not show their true returns for many years. This is contrary to the immediate need to report your performance as a fund on a short term basis. Investors are very focused on short term returns and the current peer comparison model does not encourage long term decision making.

    3) There is a current focus within the industry of reducing fees almost at any cost. Sometimes I am convinced that a fund with 0 fees and a negative return would win an industry award for excellence! This mentality makes it very difficult for a fund to invest in what everyone agrees is an investment with high entry and administrative costs, no matter what the return.

  5. Frankly

    So Markowitz is dead…and buried. Where does the risk side come into the equation? Such as liquidity risk; information risk; valuation risk…Private Equity has a role of course. And there are many opportunities to invest. Where it is appropriate.

Leave a Comment

‘Bang, fizzle, pop’: AustralianSuper CIO laments late tilt to AI

The outgoing chief investment officer of AustralianSuper Mark Delaney said one of the biggest regrets he will have as he leaves the $410 billion fund is not going overweight on the AI and digital thematic in public markets sooner, as the nation’s most powerful allocator reflects on the investment case of the technology sector in the superannuation summit in New York last week.

Sort content by