There is no ideal asset allocation. This is because resources – particularly costs and knowledge – dictate that every fund’s position will be different, according to Carl Hess, global practice director of Towers Watson Investment. If Hess was starting with a blank slate, he would advocate about 10 different positions – from equities, to skill, to commodities – among return-seeking assets. “This is more diverse than anyone has been to date,” he says. “Good allocation has a lot to do with resources, internal and external, but if a fund is willing to raise the game, there are a lot of opportunities,” he said. Asset allocation depended on the time horizon of the investor, Hess said, explaining that an endowment with a long time horizon would be very different to a defined benefit fund that was riskaverse or is closing. But, he said, probably the most important criteria affecting appropriate asset allocation is resources.
Chris Cuffe’s call for a ‘target benefits scheme’
Heap of the top: meet UBS GAM’s new boss
For VFMC, alternatives boom in the gloom
LUCRF launches new risk regime
Big scale shapes AustralianSuper’s future
Bourse tie-up may finally encourage Asia mandates
Big funds manager seeks EOIs for custody, admin
A job for Jake Jodlowski…
Brisbane deal shows Telstra Super’s unlisted tilt
…as IOOF hires asset allocation chief
IOOF chief investment officer Steve Merlicek continues to piece together a team to oversee $12 billion in multimanager funds, tapping Russell Investments for a strategy and asset allocation chief.
