After the storm, custodians hit the ground running

As the world moves along its recovery path, financial services companies are generally bracing for increased regulation and new demands from clients in the wake of the global financial crisis. In Australia, and elsewhere, various government-sponsored inquiries are underway which will probably recommend a raft of measures which affect the operations of banks, funds managers, super funds, financial planners, platform providers and even research houses. The US even has its own Financial Crisis Inquiry Committee, which held its first hearings in February and is due to report by the end of the year. Australia, of course has its Cooper and Henry inquiries, both of which are expected to report mid-year, having completed its Ripoll inquiry late last year.

Read more

Infrastructure: how super funds are changing the world

For most super funds and other  Australian institutional investors their  experience with the ownership of infrastructure  assets has, by and large, been a  happy one. Not the same can be said for  all such investors.  Each of the eastern States has at  least one disastrous toll road experience  for investors and many retail investors  in listed infrastructure funds were  taught a painful lesson by the GFC.  According to Mike Fitzpatrick, a  veteran of the asset class, much of the  recent criticism of infrastructure – and  certainly that part assigned to the  investment banks which packaged and  promoted many funds – is justifiable.  He predicts that the days when  investment banks fed transactions by  outbidding each other to win tenders  and then structuring the investments  into funds, often with long-term management  contracts in place, are hopefully  over.  Fitzpatrick, along with chief executive  John Clarke and non-executive  director Les Fallick, last year bought the  ANZ infrastructure business, which  Clarke had run since inception and had  about $1 billion invested in two unlisted  funds.

Read more

Infrastructure: how super funds are changing the world

For most super funds and other  Australian institutional investors their  experience with the ownership of infrastructure  assets has, by and large, been a  happy one. Not the same can be said for  all such investors.  Each of the eastern States has at  least one disastrous toll road experience  for investors and many retail investors  in listed infrastructure funds were  taught a painful lesson by the GFC.  According to Mike Fitzpatrick, a  veteran of the asset class, much of the  recent criticism of infrastructure – and  certainly that part assigned to the  investment banks which packaged and  promoted many funds – is justifiable.  He predicts that the days when  investment banks fed transactions by  outbidding each other to win tenders  and then structuring the investments  into funds, often with long-term management  contracts in place, are hopefully  over.  Fitzpatrick, along with chief executive  John Clarke and non-executive  director Les Fallick, last year bought the  ANZ infrastructure business, which  Clarke had run since inception and had  about $1 billion invested in two unlisted  funds.

Read more

Things will probably be okay now … but maybe not

If you thought the global financial crisis was over, don’t be too hasty. Scenario analysis by MLC Investment Management – placing probabilities against 40 different scenarios – puts the possibility of further massive falls in values for some asset classes a little too likely, or not unlikely enough, for comfort. While not alarmist, with the most likely probability being continued recovery, the analysis illustrates the uncertainty embedded in asset values over the medium term, particularly for Australian and global equities and emerging markets. Susan Gosling, head of capital markets research for MLC, has produced a summary of the analysis to illustrate recent asset allocation adjustments to some MLC funds – the “horizon” series and long-term absolute returns fund. She compares these with the probability of weighted real returns for most asset classes.

Read more

Universal picture: Back to the future with Cooper

If Australia’s fund members are divided into four categories as Jeremy Cooper wants them to be, there’s a good chance that much of the colour and innovation we see today could be lost. To me the most startling recommendation was the one which, in my opinion, would see just about every Australian worker not already operating a self-managed fund placed instead into a “universal” category, under which they would be sent “back to the future”. They’d be offered only one investment strategy (confusingly the report says this should include a target-date strategy), with vanilla insurance and minimal reporting.

Read more

Tail wagging the dog

Two recent reports by Towers Watson and Ernst & Young have identified similar criticisms of infrastructure as an asset class, and these include high entry and management fees, illiquidity, lack of transparency, and hurdle rates. Frontier Investment Consulting’s clients have about $12 billion in infrastructure [half of that in Australia], and Chris Trevillyan, who heads Frontier’s research, concurs with most of the reports’ criticisms and adds more. “There is a real issue with the dearth of attractive infrastructure fund managers in the marketplace, including structural issues with related party concerns, fees and inappropriate protection of investor rights,” he says.

Read more

Citi punts on overseas equities

Fund managers should be looking to reduce cash balances, and move into equities to leverage into the economic recovery in the next 18 months, says analyst Richard Schellbach, Citi Investment Research. “Funds need to prepare for a Chinese renminbi revaluation or devaluation, and identify the asset classes globally that have been distorted by this excess money coming out of China and Asia,” he warns. Local fund managers have to pay attention to which asset classes are being “pushed out of whack”, such as emerging market equities, and some specific commodities – for example, energy. For 2010, Citi prefers overseas shares to Australian equities because the locals are trading at a rare PE premium, says Schellbach, “and we face currency headwinds for earnings”. This overearning, due to the commodity super-cycle, is abnormal relative to local equities’ history and to global companies.

Read more

Citi punts on overseas equities

Fund managers should be looking to reduce cash balances, and move into equities to leverage into the economic recovery in the next 18 months, says analyst Richard Schellbach, Citi Investment Research. “Funds need to prepare for a Chinese renminbi revaluation or devaluation, and identify the asset classes globally that have been distorted by this excess money coming out of China and Asia,” he warns. Local fund managers have to pay attention to which asset classes are being “pushed out of whack”, such as emerging market equities, and some specific commodities – for example, energy. For 2010, Citi prefers overseas shares to Australian equities because the locals are trading at a rare PE premium, says Schellbach, “and we face currency headwinds for earnings”. This overearning, due to the commodity super-cycle, is abnormal relative to local equities’ history and to global companies.

Read more

Citi punts on overseas equities

Fund managers should be looking to reduce cash balances, and move into equities to leverage into the economic recovery in the next 18 months, says analyst Richard Schellbach, Citi Investment Research. “Funds need to prepare for a Chinese renminbi revaluation or devaluation, and identify the asset classes globally that have been distorted by this excess money coming out of China and Asia,” he warns. Local fund managers have to pay attention to which asset classes are being “pushed out of whack”, such as emerging market equities, and some specific commodities – for example, energy. For 2010, Citi prefers overseas shares to Australian equities because the locals are trading at a rare PE premium, says Schellbach, “and we face currency headwinds for earnings”. This overearning, due to the commodity super-cycle, is abnormal relative to local equities’ history and to global companies.

Read more

Don’t DIY in infrastructure, IFM tells super funds

Large superannuation funds should be fully aware of the skills and governance structure required to strike infrastructure deals before they decide to build internal teams or pursue co-investment opportunities to gain further exposure to the unlisted assets, Industry Funds Management (IFM) executives warned. Christian Seymour, IFM executive director – Europe, said funds that were considering building large infrastructure teams should be prepared to accept the workloads and resources required to skilfully originate infrastructure deals, negotiate transactions and manage the assets – and then question whether their governance framework enabled them to swiftly deploy capital when opportunities arose. “In the heat of an infrastructure transaction, when you have to make decisions quickly – a lot of funds aren’t set up to decide on a price and draw down on the capital within 10 days,” Seymour said.

Read more

No giant leap needed for Australia to host Shariah funds

Despite the wealth of the Middle East and the near proximity of Islamic nations Malaysia and Indonesia, Australian fund managers have not opened up to the $55.4 billion global Islamic investment market. Even though Australia aims to become a major financial centre in the Asia-Pacific region, and its advanced financial system and resilient economy would be attractive to most investors, most domestic managed funds remain off-limits to Islamic institutional and retail investors because the products do not comply with Shariah, Islamic law. According to Zein El Hassan, partner with law firm Clayton Utz, the 700 funds comprising the global Shariah investment industry hold about $55.4 billion under management.

Read more

Efficient beta is the new grail

The status quo of “passive” equity investment”, ranking companies by market capitalisation, is delivering lower returns for higher volatility than a beta strategy which blends a cap-weighted approach with two of its competitors – minimum variance and fundamental indexing. This is the marquee finding of a new research paper coauthored by two Lazard Asset Management quants, Paul Moghtader and Craig Scholl, as well as two executives from fundamental indexing firm Research Affiliates, founder Rob Arnott and Vitali Kalesnik. The head of Lazard AM in the Asia-Pacific, Rob Prugue, said the paper was commissioned partly through “disbelief ” that trustees still thought they could make a “truly passive” investment decision.

Read more