Passive versus Active – Jack Gray and Ron Bird have their say

It would be remiss of me to conclude without briefly turning to some related but more important research that we are conducting at the Paul Woolley Centre for Capital Market Dysfunctionality. The above discussion points out that the current environment within which active management operates is expensive – we estimate that it reduces returns by about 1.5 per cent p.a.

We also point out that other forms of over-servicing in the industry costs us another 1.5 per cent p.a. Our research suggests that most of these costs could be avoided if rather than competing to outperform each other; investors cooperated with their objective being to maximise the size of the pie in which we would all share equally. We believe that it is this much wider issue that we challenge you to debate, but recognise that it is not in the interest of the majority of your readers to do so.

 

, , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

What I took away from the world’s ‘festival of private capital’

The on- and off-stage antics at the extravagant Milken Global Conference in Los Angeles tell us a lot about where institutional capital is right on the money – and where it is putting its head in the sand. And while the event retains the extraordinary intellectual and financial firepower that has always been its signature, something has shifted. The absences are as instructive as what's on the program.

Sort content by