Tria: super funds
must change

Superannuation funds are under pressure as investor behaviour changes, particularly because of technology, says Andrew Baker, managing partner at asset management consultants Tria Investment Partners.

“Business models of super funds are under a lot of pressure and the degree to which they are has probably been underestimated,” says Baker.

“Regulatory changes and markets have been used as a kind of excuse, but what is more important is investor-behaviour changes. We’ve had an industry-centric model in the past and it needs to be more client-centric,” he says.

Agency, corruption and governance issues, says Baker, are dogging Australian asset managers that have about $1.9 trillion in funds under management, including $1.3 trillion or so in superannuation.

Baker says AustralianSuper’s member-direct product, which costs members $180 per year, is an example of the way superannuation funds may in future appeal directly to their members.

“AustralianSuper’s lead on appealing directly to members is putting pressure on retail incumbents. They have to offer more options for clients who do not have financial planners,” he says.

, , , , , ,

One response to “Tria: super funds
must change”

Leave a Comment

Geopolitical risks rewire asset allocation ‘operating system’: GIC

Some investors are “missing the point” of geopolitical risks by equating them to the disruptions from conflicts and wars, according to GIC chief economist Prakash Kannan, but in reality, geopolitical risk is no longer episodic or peripheral. This means investors need to think harder about inflation and country composition in their portfolio.

Sort content by