Insurance fund calls for defensive asset clarity

Super funds should not give up in their search for a mutually acceptable definition of defensive and growth assets, urges Paul Caskey, chief investment officer of the South Australia injury insurance scheme ReturntoWork.

Caskey, who uses the performance tables of super funds to help benchmark his $3 billion fund, has stepped into a debate that has seen a wide range of views.

PwC kicked off the debate with a paper pointing out the discrepancies in how super funds classify defensive assets in the SuperRatings SR Balanced (60-76) survey. Sam Sicilia, chief investment officer of HOSTPLUS, responded by calling for the modernisation of  how we classify defensive assets, so that they include parts of investments, such as infrastructure, with bond like characteristics. While Brad Holzberger, chief investment officer of QSuper, wants to see the industry move away from performance tables and to use individual measures of adequacy for members.

Caskey said the industry needs to show more leadership at a time when it is currently being questioned for its ethics.

“It disappoints me to see comments like ‘moving beyond the debate’ because the league tables are so widely used,” he said. “It makes it really difficult for the consumer.”

His concerns is that the more growth assets a fund can define as defensive then the better its returns will be.

“It is the average punter that is going to get burnt by this, not realising that one fund is being true to holding defensive assets and there is another fund being not as defensive as they thought,” he said.

He cited his experience before a parliamentary inquiry into how an investment strategy works for the need for clarity.

To this end, he has proposed that the industry move to a three tier system that would factor in an assets likely outcome in a market crash.

In this, cash and securities rated AA or above would be classified as low risk, while core property, infrastructure and investment grade credit would be medium risk. Finally, equities would be classified as high risk assets.

, , , ,

Leave a Comment

‘Every opportunity has to earn its place’: How the Future Fund built a TPA culture that scales

The total portfolio approach has allowed Australia’s sovereign wealth fund to capture the themes that will power markets and economies for decades to come, said director of thought leadership Craig Thorburn – but that doesn’t mean it’s not hard to scale.

Sort content by

Previous