As risk becomes more relevant to fund members as they enter retirement, new approaches to investment are being assessed. Broadly speaking, they fall into one of three categories: • Administration strategies • Derivative strategies • Insurance/outsourcing Administration strategies Administration strategies rely on dynamically altering the underlying investment mix to achieve a smoother return or risk-management outcome. Three approaches that appear to be growing in popularity are targetdate funds, target-volatility funds, and continuous portfolio protection insurance (CPPI). Target-date funds: This strategy rebalances investors’ assets between different mixes of conservative and growth assets based on an age-based “glide path,” traditionally focused on the investor’s planned retirement age. The principle behind target-date funds (also known as life-cycle funds, targetmaturity funds, and age-based retirement funds) is that investors need to adopt more conservative investment styles as they approach retirement. Target-date funds, however, have become the subject of much criticism.
Service providers battle for the boutique spend
Super funds must lobby for preventive mental health
Warts and worse show on super’s ‘agents’
Rocky Road – The Ups and Downs of MTAA Super
Walk outside MTAA House in Canberra, look to the left, and you are rewarded with a pretty good view of the flags flying on Capitol Hill. But it’s not just location that Australia’s Parliament House and 39 Brisbane Avenue, Barton, have in common. The most important man in both buildings seems to be a control freak. In Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s case, the autocratic tendencies reveal themselves in a prodigious work ethic, which sees him micromanage the release of announcements at the same rate he burns out ministerial staff. Down the road, Michael Delaney is in the unique position of having created the two organsiations which take up all of level 3 at MTAA House – the Motor Trades Association of Australia (MTAA Ltd), and its associated industry superannuation fund, MTAA Super. At the time of writing, he remained the executive director of the former, and principal executive officer of the latter. According to those who’ve been on the boards of either or both over the years, there’s not much that goes on in this House which the boss doesn’t know about, either. Assets need careful, elegant allocation
People are doing a lot of things a bit differently these days. They’re spending a little more time with their kids, for instance. According to the trashy magazines, they are also being a little more patient/ understanding with their spouses. They’re also being a little more cautious with their spending. Blame it on the GFC. In the running of super funds, things have changed a little too. Risk controls, clearly, are being discussed with more passion at board and lower levels. And relationships with most service providers have been reassessed. For some, asset allocation processes may have altered, with consultants being given more, or less, power to make decisions. But has anything really changed that much? And will the little which has changed last that long? It’s the Cooper storm that’s killed super fund marketing
The era of advertising and sponsorships by superannuation funds is surely over. The exact date it ended will be recorded as April 23, 2010, when HOSTPLUS dramatically pulled its major sponsorship of National Rugby League team Melbourne Storm, after the jaw-dropping revelations of salary cap rorting. But I’d argue the show was over three days earlier, when Jeremy Cooper’s Super System Review delivered its preliminary report introducing ‘MySuper’, the quiet younger brother of the default option.
